Fed Forecasts – Propaganda or Incompetence? – Ep. 246
Summary: Last quarter the Atlanta Fed's Q1 GDP forecast was 3.4% in February. The most recent number was actually .7%. After all the negative economic data that came out today suggesting that Q1 could be revised lower, the Atlanta Fed came out with their forecast for Q2 GDP at 4.3%. How is this possible, with no economic data to support this projection? Either they believe their policies are still valid in the face of data on a downward trajectory, or they are simply acting as salesmen, promoting economic health regardless of the actual data.
* Today was Donald Trump's 100th day as President of the United States
* The media is covering this event and looking back over the last 100 days
* Trying to assess the effectiveness of Trump's presidency thus far
* What has he accomplished, how much progress has he made;
* I think the origin of assessing the first 100 days of a presidency goes back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt
* Who of course became president during the Great Depression
* I think the President accomplished a lot during his first 100 days
* That's been the benchmark for which future presidents have been judged
* It's not about which President did the most good for the country during the first 100 days
* It's just, "Who did the most?"
* Because, FDR did a lot, all of it harmed the economy
* Not only did FDR's exacerbate and expand the depression,
* His actions had repercussions for decades
* We are suffering today from the mistakes that FDR made in his first 100 days
* He accomplished a lot, but he accomplished a lot of mistakes
* I would rather have a president do nothing for his first 100 days
* If a President just played golf for 100 days and did nothing
* Chances are he might be the best president we've ever had
* Most Presidents do damage to the economy during their first 100 days
* To the extent that they pass a law, chances are, the law just limited our freedom and reduced our standard of living
* That's true for most politicians: doing nothing is better than doing something
* Because doing something normally means doing harm
* I wish politicians would take the Hippocratic Oath, "First do not harm"
* If politicians took that oath, they could not do anything
* To the extent that a President can undo the damage done by a previous President
* Then, he would be doing a good thing
* I recognize that some of the things that Trump is trying to do is to undo Obama's mistakes
Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
* Today was Donald Trump's 100th day as President of the United States
* The media is covering this event and looking back over the last 100 days
* Trying to assess the effectiveness of Trump's presidency thus far
* What has he accomplished, how much progress has he made;
* I think the origin of assessing the first 100 days of a presidency goes back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt
* Who of course became president during the Great Depression
* I think the President accomplished a lot during his first 100 days
* That's been the benchmark for which future presidents have been judged
* It's not about which President did the most good for the country during the first 100 days
* It's just, "Who did the most?"
* Because, FDR did a lot, all of it harmed the economy
* Not only did FDR's exacerbate and expand the depression,
* His actions had repercussions for decades
* We are suffering today from the mistakes that FDR made in his first 100 days
* He accomplished a lot, but he accomplished a lot of mistakes
* I would rather have a president do nothing for his first 100 days
* If a President just played golf for 100 days and did nothing
* Chances are he might be the best president we've ever had
* Most Presidents do damage to the economy during their first 100 days
* To the extent that they pass a law, chances are, the law just limited our freedom and reduced our standard of living
* That's true for most politicians: doing nothing is better than doing something
* Because doing something normally means doing harm
* I wish politicians would take the Hippocratic Oath, "First do not harm"
* If politicians took that oath, they could not do anything
* To the extent that a President can undo the damage done by a previous President
* Then, he would be doing a good thing
* I recognize that some of the things that Trump is trying to do is to undo Obama's mistakes
Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Activity