Can hard money constrain governments' ability to finance unpopular wars?In this inaugural episode, we explore a provocative thesis: that money which can't be printed at will—whether gold or Bitcoin—creates democratic accountability by forcing governments to fund wars through direct taxation rather than hidden inflation.We examine the $2.3 trillion cost of the Afghanistan war, current defense spending proposals, and the historical relationship between monetary systems and warfare. From World War I's suspension of the gold standard to Nixon closing the gold window during Vietnam, we trace how the ability to expand money supply has transformed the nature and duration of war itself.This isn't a simple "Bitcoin good, fiat bad" argument. We explore serious counterarguments: wars happened under gold standards too, hard money creates economic constraints that can cause their own problems, and governments might find workarounds even under a Bitcoin standard.The question isn't whether hard money is perfect—it's whether the constraint on war-making power is a feature rather than a bug.Topics discussed:The hidden costs of war finance through monetary expansionHistorical examples: WWI, Vietnam, and the gold standardHow fiscal illusion obscures the true cost of military spendingThe ethical dimensions of financing war through inflationAustrian vs Keynesian perspectives on monetary constraintWhat a Bitcoin standard could mean for government accountabilityMentioned in this episode:Brown University's Costs of War ProjectThe relationship between Bretton Woods and modern warfareBenjamin Anderson's Economics and the Public Welfare