Empathy Under Fire: Understanding Its Crucial Role and Strategic Erosion

In this episode of PsyberSpace, host Leslie Poston digs into the psychological phenomenon of empathy, distinguishing it from sympathy and underscoring its pivotal role in moral reasoning, cooperation, and human survival. The episode explores the three types of empathy—cognitive, emotional, and compassionate—and how they are neurologically grounded. Leslie discusses the alarming trend of empathy being framed as a weakness or sin by authoritarian figures, media, and extremist ideologies, which aim to dehumanize outgroups for control. The episode emphasizes the importance of empathy in social cohesion and the dangers of its erosion, driven by fear and strategic manipulation. It also highlights effective strategies and programs for cultivating and restoring empathy in individuals and societies, advocating for small actions and systemic changes to foster a culture of care and mutual understanding.

00:00 Introduction to Empathy
01:32 The Psychology of Empathy
03:16 Empathy in Childhood Development
04:12 Empathy and Society
04:48 The Assault on Empathy
05:57 Empathy and Authoritarianism
08:25 Weaponization of Religion
11:09 The Rise of Spite
14:53 Rebuilding Empathy
18:17 Empathy in Action
22:00 Conclusion and Call to Action

I'm nominated for a Women in Podcasting award! Voting is open during the month of May - I'd love your support. Note: You don't have to vote for every category, just look for PsyberSpace in Science Podcasts at this link https://www.womenpodcasters.com/awards-voting?sc=27127076032d7fd70ddcab921ce8652fb78353d03

References

Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. University of Manitoba Press.

Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., & Saxe, R. (2017). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 149-153.

Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54-58.

Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.

Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.

Marcus-Newhall, A., Miller, N., Holtz, R., & Brewer, M. B. (1993). Cross-cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 125-146.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922-934.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763.

Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 475-493.

Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157-1162.

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062.

Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608-1647.

Zak, P. J. (2015). Why inspiring stories make us react: The neuroscience of narrative. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science, 2015, 2.