Murder in Uniform: Britain's Special Forces and Their Killings in Afghanistan
Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on 'what the papers don't say' - without fear or favour.
To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.
Help us build the better media Britain deserves
There is a rot at the heart of Britain's military mythology. For years, politicians and generals have draped the Special Air Service (SAS) and its kindred regiments in the teflon cloaks of honour, sacrifice and secrecy. But myths have a habit of unravelling and this one is fast doing so. And what has emerged, as revealed by a years-long BBC Panorama investigation and parallel work by my charity Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), is not the heroic professionalism of elite warriors. It's something far darker.
It's the body of a child, handcuffed and shot in the head.
It's the tally kept of kills by men who seem to have relished bloodshed.
It's the planted weapons, the falsified reports, the footage never watched, the servers wiped clean.
It is, bluntly, murder. And done in our names.
'F**k Trump': Kyiv Faces the Darkest Hour
Chris York explores the mood in the capital as Ukrainians try to make sense of the US President's support for the Kremlin
Chris York
For those of us who have spent years documenting the civilian costs of the war on Terror, these most recent allegations - in Panorama's exceptional film 'Special Forces: I saw war crimes' - confirm what many long suspected. That Britain's Special Forces almost certainly conducted a campaign of extrajudicial killings in Afghanistan with impunity. And that a military judicial system built to restrain them catastrophically failed. Worse, it may have even have helped cover their tracks.
This is not the misconduct of a few "bad apples". This is not battlefield confusion. The testimonies aired by Panorama - drawn from interview with more than 30 former soldiers, intelligence officers, and insiders - reveals systematic wrongdoing. Operations where "everyone knew what was going on", attacks where detainees were executed, raid where children were murdered, and missions where those acts were recorded, not for accountability, but seemingly as trophies.
The most shocking revelation may not be the killings themselves. It is just how many people knew. Knew, and stayed silent. Or worse - knew and enabled.
Commanding officers. Legal advisors. Ministers. Even, allegedly, a former Prime Minister.
They were warned. And yet they did nothing.
Instead, what emerges is a choreography of concealment.
Legal manoeuvring to block inquiries, manipulation of official language to stay within the "rules of engagement", refusals to hand over evidence, and the deeply troubling revelation that Special Forces were granted a secret veto over the UK asylum claims of Afghan soldiers - men who had witnessed these killings first-hand.
This veto, in particular, reveals a moral depravity at odds with Britain's self-image as a nation of law and order. As a nation that 'exported' democracy to Afghanistan.
The suggestion that some of the "Triples" - Afghan special forces who fought and bled alongside British troops - were left behind to be tortured or killed by the Taliban, not because they were a security risk, but because they were witnesses, should be a wound in the national psyche. It should haunt every official who signed those rejections. It should haunt the Ministry of Defence.
MoD Blocks National Audit Office Report Amid Calls for Transparency Over Defence Spending
'This is a truly appalling decision from a department which for decades has been notorious for its careless and wasteful attitude towards taxpayers' money'
Edward Lander and Iain Overton
These are not mere allegations of misconduct. These are detailed allegations of war crimes. That phrase has weight and with it carries a legal threshold. The killing of wounded detainees; the execution of unar...
To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.
Help us build the better media Britain deserves
There is a rot at the heart of Britain's military mythology. For years, politicians and generals have draped the Special Air Service (SAS) and its kindred regiments in the teflon cloaks of honour, sacrifice and secrecy. But myths have a habit of unravelling and this one is fast doing so. And what has emerged, as revealed by a years-long BBC Panorama investigation and parallel work by my charity Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), is not the heroic professionalism of elite warriors. It's something far darker.
It's the body of a child, handcuffed and shot in the head.
It's the tally kept of kills by men who seem to have relished bloodshed.
It's the planted weapons, the falsified reports, the footage never watched, the servers wiped clean.
It is, bluntly, murder. And done in our names.
'F**k Trump': Kyiv Faces the Darkest Hour
Chris York explores the mood in the capital as Ukrainians try to make sense of the US President's support for the Kremlin
Chris York
For those of us who have spent years documenting the civilian costs of the war on Terror, these most recent allegations - in Panorama's exceptional film 'Special Forces: I saw war crimes' - confirm what many long suspected. That Britain's Special Forces almost certainly conducted a campaign of extrajudicial killings in Afghanistan with impunity. And that a military judicial system built to restrain them catastrophically failed. Worse, it may have even have helped cover their tracks.
This is not the misconduct of a few "bad apples". This is not battlefield confusion. The testimonies aired by Panorama - drawn from interview with more than 30 former soldiers, intelligence officers, and insiders - reveals systematic wrongdoing. Operations where "everyone knew what was going on", attacks where detainees were executed, raid where children were murdered, and missions where those acts were recorded, not for accountability, but seemingly as trophies.
The most shocking revelation may not be the killings themselves. It is just how many people knew. Knew, and stayed silent. Or worse - knew and enabled.
Commanding officers. Legal advisors. Ministers. Even, allegedly, a former Prime Minister.
They were warned. And yet they did nothing.
Instead, what emerges is a choreography of concealment.
Legal manoeuvring to block inquiries, manipulation of official language to stay within the "rules of engagement", refusals to hand over evidence, and the deeply troubling revelation that Special Forces were granted a secret veto over the UK asylum claims of Afghan soldiers - men who had witnessed these killings first-hand.
This veto, in particular, reveals a moral depravity at odds with Britain's self-image as a nation of law and order. As a nation that 'exported' democracy to Afghanistan.
The suggestion that some of the "Triples" - Afghan special forces who fought and bled alongside British troops - were left behind to be tortured or killed by the Taliban, not because they were a security risk, but because they were witnesses, should be a wound in the national psyche. It should haunt every official who signed those rejections. It should haunt the Ministry of Defence.
MoD Blocks National Audit Office Report Amid Calls for Transparency Over Defence Spending
'This is a truly appalling decision from a department which for decades has been notorious for its careless and wasteful attitude towards taxpayers' money'
Edward Lander and Iain Overton
These are not mere allegations of misconduct. These are detailed allegations of war crimes. That phrase has weight and with it carries a legal threshold. The killing of wounded detainees; the execution of unar...
Activity