What did I miss? Beef milkshake? I pray this is some sort of inside joke...

I'm so damn pumped!!!! It feels like we've ditched the skis and hijacked a snowmobile. 100%%%%%

Although I agree this requirement shouldn't exist, I don't find this rationale convincing—validation could be performed on the host side (as Adam mentioned) and the player side. [2/6]

A much better reason, in my mind, is the same as why companies don't limit number of shares to a 100—it would limit the maximum number of shareholders and the fractions they can own. [3/6]

Finally, as a math teacher, I feel the most intuitive way of explaining splits to newcomers is by thinking of them as ratios, a concept familiar to most as it is found in many recipes! [5/6]

Dave seemed to suggest that we don't require splits to add up to a 100 because it is easy to make mistakes and produce a different total amount. [1/6]

And, due to precision issues, we should always prefer integers to decimal numbers in financial software (that's why Stripe API uses cents instead of dollars, for example). [4/6]

E.g., If Alice's, Bob's, and Charlie's splits are 4, 2, and 3, respectively, they will share the incoming sats in the ratios 4 to 2 to 3. [6/6]

Another great episode.

I have a question about the splits...I was happily streaming 17sat/min I think calculate the first split % goto the highest % and then calculating down. streaming less than 1 sat/min is not a thing, so I see on a show 22sat/min pop up... don't mind the small difference, Aldo I think when you have 100 splits in an episode I would stream +/- 100sat/min. I only use fountain at the moment, maybe other apps handle this differently. Is this how it was intended??? For the user its unexpected.

Thanks for your value to the podcast movement. Greetings from Dominican Republic.

sorry I have not been boosting as much as normal. life happens… great episodes as always .. go podcasting..

looks like i have to boost 10 times 1000 sats. pity i liked podfriend from browser. it was playing video.

Boost

tast