Episode Notes: "Prince Ricardo De La Cerda: Warning DOGE is Unconstitutional"Introduction:Overview of the seismic shifts expected in American democracy as Donald Trump approaches a potential second term.Main Content:The Myth of DOGE:Introduction to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), purportedly co-headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.Discussion on how despite being a legal fiction, DOGE is being debated by Republicans in Congress and the media as if it's a real entity.Insight into the roles of Sen. Joni Ernst and other politicians who are driving the narrative around DOGE.Legal analysis explaining that only Congress has the authority to create federal agencies, highlighting the unconstitutional nature of DOGE.Trump's Influence on Presidential Powers:Examination of how Trump's presidency has influenced the Supreme Court's decisions, particularly concerning the immunity of presidents.Discussion on the precedent set by Trump for potentially using presidential powers for personal or political gains.Constitutional Boundaries and Overreach:Detailed look at the powers of federal agencies, the checks and balances intended by the constitution, and how these are being overlooked in current discussions.Analysis of the Administrative Procedure Act and other laws that regulate agency actions, aiming to prevent overreach and ensure accountability.The 22nd Amendment Debate:Overview of the ongoing debates regarding the 22nd Amendment and the implications of a potential third term for Trump.Arguments and legal interpretations being considered, stressing the clear language of the Constitution limiting presidential terms.Closing Thoughts:Reflection on the implications of these developments for the future of American democracy.Commentary on the normalization of these unprecedented shifts and the potential long-term effects on the constitutional separation of powers.Call to action for listeners to engage in the conversation and remain informed about these critical issues.Conclusion:Summary of the main points discussed.Reminder of the importance of constitutional integrity and the potential irreversible impacts of undermining it.